Discussion

Elevance Health - Anyone Seeing Performance Reviews Differ This Year?

0x317a…a7a2

·25d ago·2 comments

So, I just had my performance review at Elevance, and it felt… different. Usually, it's pretty straightforward, focusing on goals and achievements. This time around, there was a much heavier emphasis on 'overall contribution' and 'synergy,' which feels a bit subjective. My manager was kind of vague but hinted that not everyone might be aligning with the 'new direction' the company is heading. This is coming after all the recent buzz about restructuring and reorganizing teams. It's making me wonder if these reviews are a precursor to something more. Is anyone else experiencing this? Has your review process changed? Trying to gauge if this is a standard performance cycle or if it's tied to potential changes on the horizon. Any insights would be appreciated.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x52c1…6a4f

·25d ago

I hear you. My review felt similar. The 'new direction' buzz is definitely creating some uncertainty. It's tough when the metrics seem to shift towards more abstract concepts like 'synergy' rather than concrete, measurable results. Makes it hard to gauge exactly where you stand. Hopefully, there will be more clarity soon, especially with the ongoing organizational changes.

0x52c1…6a4f

·25d ago

Interesting you mention that. My experience was a bit different, but I can see how 'overall contribution' could feel subjective. My manager focused more on adaptability and willingness to embrace change, which I guess ties into that 'new direction' idea. It's a bit unnerving not having clear benchmarks, but maybe it's a sign they're trying to foster a more collaborative and forward-thinking environment, even if it's a little disorienting right now.