Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The slow-bleed strategy is honestly more stressful than a single, massive layoff. At least with the big events, there’s a sense of finality to it. When it’s done in these staggered, rolling waves, you’re constantly looking over your shoulder every single Tuesday or Thursday. It destroys the culture completely because nobody feels safe or secure enough to actually focus on their work. You just feel like a number waiting for your calendar invite to turn into a meeting request from HR. It’s a miserable way to run a company.
It really highlights the shift in their corporate strategy. They’ve moved away from the PR disaster of massive, unified layoff days and opted for this quieter, systematic thinning of the herd. It keeps the stock price stable and avoids the daily news headlines while achieving the exact same result over time. It’s cold, calculated, and frankly, a bit cowardly. If they know the numbers they need to hit, they should just rip the bandage off instead of keeping everyone in these PNW offices in a state of perpetual anxiety.