Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I've seen this pattern play out at HP multiple times over the last few years. They love the 'silent attrition' strategy because it avoids the headlines and the morale hit of a public RIF. When HR keeps kicking back approved requisitions for 'further review,' it’s a clear signal that the internal financial controllers are tightening the screws behind the scenes. Don't expect that role to open up anytime soon; if they aren't letting you backfill now, they are likely banking those salary savings to hit end-of-quarter targets. It’s frustrating, but it’s standard operating procedure when they want to downsize without the paperwork.
Honestly, stop waiting for the system to change. This has been the reality at HP for a long time. If you’re stuck in the limbo of endless approvals, it’s not an HR error; it’s a deliberate pivot in management strategy. They know exactly what they are doing by stalling your backfill request. You’re being forced to do more with less while they wait for natural attrition to lower the headcount numbers. It’s incredibly demoralizing to watch, but you need to prioritize your own bandwidth. If the team is underwater, document the extra workload, but don't burn yourself out waiting for a hire that leadership has already decided won't happen.