Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It’s honestly exhausting watching this cycle repeat. They call it 'optimizing for efficiency' to make it sound clinical, but everyone on the floor knows it’s just about padding the quarterly numbers at the expense of our job security. When you see these rolling layoffs happening every few months, you stop looking at your projects and start looking for the exit. The lack of transparency from leadership is the real issue; they treat us like line items instead of the people actually keeping the lights on. It’s hard to stay invested when you’re constantly waiting for the next shoe to drop.
I’ve been tracking these notices for a while, and the pattern in Columbia is becoming impossible to ignore. Thirty-one people might seem like a 'targeted adjustment' to the folks in the corporate office, but for those of us actually working these programs, it’s a massive hit to morale and institutional knowledge. It feels like they are intentionally thinning out the staff to make the site look less essential during future reviews. If you’re feeling uneasy, trust that instinct—the way things are being handled right now suggests that this isn't the end of the downsizing.