Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is honestly exhausting watching the same pattern play out every fiscal cycle. Management talks about efficiency and automation like it’s a shiny new upgrade, but we all know it’s just a way to hollow out the newsroom. Losing experienced editorial staff is a massive blow to the quality of the content. You can’t replace institutional knowledge and genuine journalistic judgment with an algorithm or a poorly prompted AI tool. The morale here is at an all-time low, and frankly, I don't see how they plan to maintain standards when the people doing the actual work are being pushed out the door.
I was expecting layoffs, but the scale of what happened on the digital desk is honestly staggering. Everyone knew the transition was coming, but they’ve been completely opaque about how deep these cuts would actually go. Being told it’s about 'streamlining' is just a standard corporate insult at this point. It’s transparently obvious that they are prioritizing short-term cost-cutting over the actual sustainability of the publication. The remaining team members are going to be completely buried by the workload, and the quality of the output is inevitably going to suffer for it. It feels like the end of an era.