Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It's definitely concerning to see this pattern repeat. Last year's cuts were framed around streamlining and investing in digital, but 1400 more people feels significant. My guess is it's a mix of things – maybe some departments are indeed overstaffed, but it could also reflect broader economic pressures or a shift in their strategic focus that hasn't paid off as expected. Retail is tough, and competition is fierce, so they might be consolidating resources in areas they believe will drive future growth, even if it means painful restructuring now.
Heard whispers about this. It's rarely just one thing. Could be a response to slowing sales growth, increased competition from brands like Adidas and newer players, or even just internal reorgs to align with new leadership's vision. Sometimes companies also make these moves to appease shareholders, especially if they're feeling pressure on their profit margins. Hard to say for sure without being on the inside, but it's definitely a sign that even giants like Nike aren't immune to market volatility and the need to adapt.