Discussion

P&G's Layoff Strategy: More Than Just Cost Cutting?

0x2e8f…59bc

·55d ago·2 comments

Seeing the recent layoffs at P&G, especially the 1,600 figure reported for June 11th, makes me wonder about the bigger picture. It's easy to just say 'cost-cutting,' but is there something else going on? Are they restructuring significantly, divesting certain brands, or maybe investing heavily in automation/AI that's displacing roles? The news source (CoStar) isn't usually wrong, but the lack of specific department details is frustrating. It feels like a constant state of flux. Anyone have insights from within P&G about the strategic rationale behind these cuts? Are we talking about a shift in market focus, a response to competitive pressures, or something else entirely? Curious to hear if people think this is a sustainable approach or if it's creating more problems than it solves in terms of morale and institutional knowledge loss.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x7036…5650

·55d ago

I've noticed a lot of churn at P&G over the past few years. It does feel like more than just trimming the fat. The company has a massive portfolio, and I wouldn't be surprised if they're strategically pruning underperforming brands or those that don't fit their long-term vision. Streamlining operations makes sense, especially with the pace of market changes. It's a tough environment for employees, for sure, but for a company of that size, adapting is key to survival.

0x317a…a7a2

·55d ago

It's always unsettling to hear about large-scale layoffs, and the lack of clarity is definitely frustrating for those inside and observing from the outside. While cost-cutting is almost always a factor, P&G is a giant with diverse business units. It's plausible they're undergoing a significant reorganization, perhaps shifting focus towards their core strengths or divesting divisions that are no longer strategically aligned. The market demands agility, and sometimes that means difficult decisions regarding workforce adjustments.