Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It honestly feels like they are being incredibly selective with how they communicate these cuts to keep the rest of us in the dark. From what I’ve gathered talking to people across different Slack channels, it wasn’t just one department. It seems like they took a surgical approach to trim overhead in IT and Support specifically to hit those quarterly efficiency targets. If you look at the roles, they seem to be focusing on mid-level positions that they think can be offloaded to automation or outsourced entirely. It’s definitely a headcount play disguised as restructuring.
I was affected in the latest round, and I can tell you it felt completely random. I was in a non-tech role, and my entire team was blindsided. Management didn't give us a clear 'why' other than the usual corporate jargon about streamlining and future-proofing. It’s pretty frustrating to watch everyone speculate when the reality is just a cold, calculated move to keep the shareholders happy before the next earnings call. Don’t expect any transparency from the top; they’ve already moved on to the next quarterly strategy.