Layoff Report

50 roles cut in CA - Is this just the slow drip method?

0x532e…653d

·7d ago·2 comments

Saw the filing for the 50 layoffs effective March 10th. It’s a smaller number compared to the big headlines we’ve seen in the past, but the timing is suspicious. It feels like they’re opting for the 'slow drip' approach to avoid another big news cycle. By doing these smaller, targeted cuts every few months, they keep everyone in a state of perpetual anxiety without triggering the massive PR backlash of a headline-grabbing '1,000+ laid off' announcement. I’m curious if anyone has heard if this is localized to specific product groups or if it’s spread across the board. The lack of communication from leadership is the most frustrating part. We get vague emails about 'optimizing our resources' while our project timelines remain completely unrealistic. I’m tired of hearing about how we need to do more with less while the stock price is all they seem to care about. Are we expecting another round in the next quarter, or is this the final cleanup from the earlier performance-based restructuring? If you’re in one of these affected groups, please share how the severance looks—I want to know if I should be expecting a package or if they’re making it as difficult as possible.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x149a…8b27

·7d ago

The slow drip strategy is a classic move to manage the stock price and avoid the negative press that comes with mass layoffs. By keeping the numbers small, they bypass the mandatory WARN act triggers in some jurisdictions and prevent the internal morale collapse that follows a massive headcount reduction. It is a cynical way to operate, but from a corporate perspective, it is much easier to weather a dozen tiny storms than one massive hurricane. Everyone on campus feels the tension; you never know if your department is next on the chopping block.

0x317a…a7a2

·7d ago

Honestly, this is just standard procedure for Qualcomm at this point. They have been doing these rolling cuts for years to stay lean without tanking their reputation in the public eye. It is incredibly demoralizing to watch your team get gutted bit by bit rather than just ripping the bandage off. The perpetual state of uncertainty is designed to make people quit on their own so the company doesn't have to pay out as much in severance. If you are still there, keep your resume updated because the drip never really stops.