Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is honestly becoming a recurring pattern with Raymond James lately. People keep talking about these 'efficiencies,' but it just feels like death by a thousand cuts. Richmond losing nineteen people might look like a small blip in the grand scheme of the quarterly report, but for those of us on the ground, it signals a deeper shift in culture. When the communication from above becomes this hollow, you know it is time to start polishing the resume before you get caught in the next round of streamlining.
I understand the concern, but we have seen these small shifts before without the whole house coming down. Richmond is an easy target for consolidation, but that does not necessarily mean there is a systemic collapse coming for the rest of us. The firm has a history of pulling back in specific regions when margins get tight, yet we tend to bounce back. Try not to let the Slack silence get to you; just keep your head down, focus on your book, and see if things settle once the quarterly dust clears.