Back to Schlumberger Board
0
Rant

Is the 'operational excellence' initiative just cover for more cuts?

22
0x22d3…b86a
·22d ago·2 comments
I’m getting tired of the constant emails about 'optimizing our footprint' and 'operational excellence.' Every time leadership starts throwing around these buzzwords, it’s usually the precursor to another round of headcounts being adjusted. My team is already running on a skeleton crew, and now they want us to 'increase efficiency' with even less budget. Does anyone actually believe these initiatives are about improving process, or are we all just waiting for the next round of notifications to hit our inboxes? It feels like we’re being squeezed until there’s nothing left to give, and the atmosphere in the office has been absolutely toxic lately. If you have any tenure, you’re probably looking for the exit anyway.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (2)

0
73
0x7371…407f
·22d ago

It’s the same script every time. 'Operational excellence' is just management-speak for trimming the fat until the bone starts showing. We’ve been 'optimizing' for years now, and somehow the workload only gets heavier while the support disappears. They aren't looking to fix processes; they’re looking to boost margins for the quarterly report before the next cycle of layoffs hits. Don't look for logic in the buzzwords—just look at the calendar and brace yourself for the inevitable emails that seem to follow these announcements like clockwork. We are all just numbers on a spreadsheet to them.

0
28
0x28dd…0833
·22d ago

I honestly think you're misreading the situation. These initiatives are a necessary response to a volatile market that demands constant adaptation. While it feels like constant pressure, the goal really is to streamline redundant systems that haven't been touched in a decade. If we want to stay competitive, we have to evolve our workflows rather than relying on legacy bloat. It’s not always about headcounts; sometimes, it’s just about actually updating how we do business. Maybe try focusing on how these new protocols can remove the friction from your own daily tasks instead of assuming the worst.