Schlumberger

·2026-11-07T10:01:01.217911+00:00·2

Anyone else feel like the culture is completely dead?

I’ve been with Schlumberger for a while now, and the vibe has shifted from 'we’re the industry leader' to 'just keep your head down and hope you aren't picked.' It’s impossible to plan a future here when they’re pulling these small, localized layoffs every few weeks. We keep hearing about the big picture strategy and digital transformation, but none of that matters when you're watching your colleagues get walked out. It’s hard to stay motivated to hit project KPIs when there’s zero job security. Is anyone else noticing that the veteran engineers are starting to quietly jump ship? The talent drain is real, and the ones left behind are just picking up the slack until the next round of cuts hits. It’s a race to the bottom at this point.

0x7371…407f

Layoff Report

So it begins again: 2 more gone in Dubuque

Saw the WARN notice hit today for the Dubuque location. Only two people this time, effective November 1st. It feels like they’re just trimming around the edges to keep the headlines quiet while everyone else is left wondering if they’re next. Honestly, it’s the slow drip that’s worse than a big announcement—at least then you know where you stand. Is anyone seeing similar low-headcount cuts at other field offices? Every time I check the internal portal, I’m holding my breath expecting to see my department name on the list. The uncertainty is draining everyone’s productivity, but management just keeps talking about 'optimizing our footprint.' If this is what optimization looks like, count me out.

0x532e…653d

·2026-11-07T10:00:58.542732+00:00·2

Anyone else tired of the 'transformation' strategy?

Every time we have a town hall, they talk about our new 'agile focus' and 'streamlining workflows.' Funny how that always ends up looking exactly like a smaller headcount and more work for the people left behind. I’ve been with SLB for six years, and the culture has shifted from 'we're in this together' to 'who is going to be the next to disappear on a Friday afternoon?' The Dubuque news is just the latest reminder that nobody is really safe. We’re all just numbers on a spreadsheet being optimized for the next earnings call. I’m honestly exhausted by the constant pivot toward 'operational excellence' when it’s clearly just a cover for shrinking the payroll. Has anyone actually seen a positive change from these restructures, or are we just watching the ship slowly take on water while they sell off the lifeboats? Just curious if anyone has an exit strategy or if you're all just hunkering down and hoping for the best.

·2026-11-06T10:01:18.699323+00:00·2

Layoff Report

Quiet cuts in Dubuque? Just the tip of the iceberg?

Saw the recent WARN notice for the Dubuque site. Only two people listed, which honestly feels like a drop in the bucket compared to what we’ve been hearing in the halls lately. It’s always the same song and dance—leadership claims it’s a localized restructuring, but we know how this goes. They prune a few here and there to avoid hitting the big WARN reporting thresholds elsewhere, hoping nobody notices the slow bleed. Is anyone else seeing this same pattern at other hubs? I’m hearing rumblings about performance reviews being used as a convenient filter to thin the herd before the fiscal year-end. If you’re at a smaller site, are they keeping things quiet, or is it getting noticeably sparse in your office? I’m trying to figure out if it’s time to start polishing the resume or if this is just standard quarterly noise. The uncertainty is getting old fast.

0x7036…5650

·2026-11-06T10:01:16.308481+00:00·1

·2026-10-16T10:01:21.300069+00:00·2

Is the 'operational excellence' initiative just cover for more cuts?

I’m getting tired of the constant emails about 'optimizing our footprint' and 'operational excellence.' Every time leadership starts throwing around these buzzwords, it’s usually the precursor to another round of headcounts being adjusted. My team is already running on a skeleton crew, and now they want us to 'increase efficiency' with even less budget. Does anyone actually believe these initiatives are about improving process, or are we all just waiting for the next round of notifications to hit our inboxes? It feels like we’re being squeezed until there’s nothing left to give, and the atmosphere in the office has been absolutely toxic lately. If you have any tenure, you’re probably looking for the exit anyway.

0x22d3…b86a

Layoff Report

WARN notice for Dubuque hit - just 2 people this time?

Just saw the latest WARN filing for the Dubuque location, dated Oct 7th. It says only 2 employees are being let go effective Nov 1st. Honestly, feels like they’re just trimming the fat or getting rid of specific roles that didn't make the cut during the last restructuring. Is this it for the quarter, or is this just the slow drip before a bigger wave? It’s unnerving how they keep these numbers low in public filings while the internal chatter suggests headcount reduction is the primary KPI for management right now. Anyone at that site know if these were field guys or back office support? Hope you guys find something better quickly.

·2026-10-16T10:01:19.007651+00:00·1

·2026-09-27T10:01:01.626772+00:00·1

Stagnant utilization rates vs. 'operational excellence'

It’s getting laughable at this point. We’re being hammered with mandatory training modules on 'Operational Excellence' and 'Efficiency Optimization' while half the team in my district is sitting in the staging area with absolutely nothing to do. We’re being told to log our hours strictly, but then get questioned why utilization is down. How are we supposed to keep numbers up when the clients aren't greenlighting projects? I have a feeling the next round of cuts is going to be framed as a performance issue, which is total BS. They are looking for any reason to trim the headcount without admitting that the workflow just isn't there right now. Start backing up your personal files and update your resumes, because the narrative they’re setting up is clearly designed to shift the blame onto us when they decide to trim the fat.

0x532e…653d

Anyone else seeing the sudden freeze on requisitions?

Is it just my department or is everyone seeing a total lockdown on open headcount? I was tracking a few internal mobility opportunities for the last month, and suddenly everything has been pulled or marked as 'on hold indefinitely.' My manager is being extremely cagey during our 1:1s, using that classic 'we're re-evaluating our priorities for Q3' line. It feels like the calm before the storm. I’ve been through two cycles here already and this quietness—where leadership stops talking about growth and starts talking about 'streamlining core operations'—is usually the precursor to a bad Friday morning. Has anyone heard anything concrete from HR, or are we all just waiting for the other shoe to drop?

·2026-09-27T10:00:59.199813+00:00·2

·2026-09-12T10:00:57.498484+00:00·1

Feeling the pressure to take more bench time

Management is really pushing for people to take unpaid leave or 'personal development' time if they aren't directly billable right now. I’ve been with SLB for five years, and usually, they find something to keep us busy, but the vibe is totally different this time around. It feels like they are clearing the deck or trying to force people out voluntarily before they have to do the messy stuff. A few guys in my department already took the bait and left, but I’m worried that if I don’t push back, I’m basically signaling that I’m expendable. Has anyone else been pressured into these 'flexible' scheduling arrangements? Just wondering if this is a company-wide initiative or if my specific geo-market is just looking for ways to cut costs without an official announcement.

0x7f73…4468

·2026-09-12T10:00:55.091769+00:00·2

Anyone else noticing the 'optimization' buzzwords in emails?

Is it just me, or has the language coming from leadership shifted significantly over the last month? I’ve sat through three town halls now where they keep emphasizing 'operational efficiency' and 'streamlining organizational structures' instead of talking about growth or new contracts. We all know how this story usually ends at SLB. I'm seeing more VPs hanging around the floor than usual, which is never a great sign. Is anyone hearing anything about potential headcount adjustments for Q3 or Q4? My group has been light on work for weeks, and the silence from my manager whenever I ask about the pipeline is getting deafening. Trying to decide if I should start polishing the resume this weekend or if I’m just being paranoid because of the industry-wide jitters.

0x28dd…0833

Salary

Schlumberger - Any news on salary reviews/bonuses this year?

Curious about what others are hearing regarding compensation. The market's been a bit wild, and with the push for productivity, I'm wondering how that's reflecting in our annual reviews and bonus payouts. Last year felt a bit stagnant, and I'm hoping for some adjustment given the current economic climate and the effort everyone's putting in. Has anyone heard anything concrete from HR or management about salary increase pools or bonus targets? Are they looking at performance metrics more closely this year? Honestly, just trying to get a sense of where the company stands financially and how that might impact our wallets. Feels like a lot of us are performing at a high level, and it would be good to see that recognized. Any intel, even rumors, is welcome.

0x3ef5…7b77

·2026-08-30T22:00:39.915046+00:00·2

SLB - What's the vibe on projects and workload lately?

Hey everyone, been with SLB for a few years now, and lately, things feel… different. We're hearing a lot about efficiency and optimizing resources, which I get, but it's starting to translate into some pretty intense project loads. Feels like teams are thinner than they should be, and the pressure to deliver the same, if not more, with fewer people is definitely there. Anyone else in operations or engineering seeing this trend? Wondering if it's a company-wide thing or just my division. Trying to gauge if this is just a temporary crunch or the new normal. Any insights on how other departments are handling it, or if there are any whispers about potential restructuring down the line, would be appreciated. Trying to stay ahead of the curve, you know?

·2026-08-30T22:00:38.050618+00:00·1

·2026-08-25T22:00:42.600013+00:00·2

SLB - Anyone else feeling the pressure to 'do more with less'?

It feels like the mantra around here lately. Resources are tight, budgets are being scrutinized like never before, and the expectation is that we all just absorb the extra workload. I'm not hearing about any mass layoffs, thankfully, but the 'quiet squeeze' is definitely real. Project scopes seem to be shrinking, travel budgets are slashed, and there's a general sense of belt-tightening everywhere you look. It makes planning and execution really challenging when you're constantly being asked to do more with less. Anyone else in a similar boat? What strategies are your teams using to cope? Are you seeing this trickle down to compensation or performance reviews as well? Just trying to gauge if this is a widespread SLB thing or if I'm in a particularly squeezed corner of the company.

0x1cd8…e6e5

Schlumberger - Quiet on the hiring front?

Been seeing a lot of chatter on here about other energy services companies being a bit uncertain, and it got me thinking about SLB. Anyone else notice things have really slowed down on the hiring side lately? Feels like for every opening that pops up, there are 100 resumes waiting. My own team has been treading water, no new heads in months. Even internal transfers seem to be stuck in limbo. Is this just a seasonal thing, or is anyone hearing anything more concrete about budget cuts or a general slowdown in the field? Trying to get a pulse on the situation without causing undue panic, but the silence is deafening. Curious to hear what others are experiencing across different departments and regions.

·2026-08-25T22:00:40.379612+00:00·1

·2026-08-20T22:01:37.912263+00:00·1

Schlumberger - Anyone else on hiring freeze patrol?

Been trying to get some essential headcount approved for my team for weeks now and it's just dead air. Every time I push, it's 'under review' or 'budget constraints.' We're already stretched thin and this is starting to impact project timelines. Is this a company-wide thing or just my division? Anyone in HR or management see this happening elsewhere? Feels like they're holding their breath on everything. Could be strategic, could be a precursor to something else. Just trying to understand the internal hiring climate. Has anyone been told directly that there's a hiring freeze in place, even if it's unofficial? Trying to plan workload and it's becoming increasingly difficult with this uncertainty. Any intel would be helpful.

0x22d3…b86a

SLB - What's the vibe in your district/product line?

Hey everyone, seeing a lot of chatter but nothing concrete. Just wondering what the general feeling is across different parts of Schlumberger. My area has definitely seen a slowdown in activity and a lot of 'belt-tightening' talk. Budgets are reportedly frozen for non-essential projects and travel is being scrutinized heavily. Anyone in Ops, Engineering, or Support seeing similar trends? Is it across the board or specific to certain regions/business lines? Trying to get a sense of the broader picture before jumping to conclusions. Is it just a seasonal lull or something more systemic? Curious to hear what others are experiencing and if anyone has heard any whispers from management about future plans. Trying to stay informed without succumbing to the rumor mill. Appreciate any insights.

·2026-08-20T22:01:35.830523+00:00·1

·2026-08-15T22:01:39.832943+00:00·1

Schlumberger - Anyone else feeling the budget squeeze?

Just wanted to see if I'm alone here. Been noticing some serious budget tightening across the board in my division. Small things first, like travel approvals getting stricter, then training budgets slashed, and now even internal project funding seems to be under a microscope. It's not just me – I've overheard colleagues in other departments complaining about the same thing. It feels like someone's holding their breath somewhere, waiting for something to happen. The official line is always 'optimizing resources' or 'focusing on core priorities,' but it feels different this time. More like a cold wind blowing through. Anyone in support functions or R&D experiencing this? Curious if this is a precursor to something bigger or just the usual cyclical stuff. Definitely makes it harder to plan long-term.

0x1cd8…e6e5

·2026-08-15T22:01:37.699402+00:00·1

SLB - Slowdown in North America operations?

Hey everyone. Been with SLB for a few years now, mostly field operations in the US. Lately, it feels like things have really slowed down. We're not getting the same number of calls for new projects, and some of the existing ones are being stretched out. My manager's been pretty tight-lipped, just saying 'we're being cautious.' Anyone else in the field seeing this? Feels a bit uneasy, especially with all the noise about the broader energy market. Used to be, if a rig was down, another was up almost immediately. Now it's like there's a pause button being held down. Wondering if this is a regional thing or if it's company-wide. Haven't heard any direct layoff talk, but this creeping slowdown is definitely getting people talking in the break rooms. Just trying to gauge the temperature out there.

0x22d3…b86a

SLB - Anyone else noticing a hush on new roles opening up?

I've been keeping an eye on openings at Schlumberger for a while now, and it feels like the tap has been turned down to a trickle lately. Not just for my specific discipline, but generally across the board from what I've seen. It's not like there were mass layoffs announced, but this feels like a proactive measure, maybe a hiring pause or a significant slowdown in backfilling positions. Anyone else in a similar boat, either actively looking or just observing the internal job boards? Wondering if this is a company-wide strategy or if it's concentrated in certain divisions. Curious about the thought process behind it – is it a sign of caution, an attempt to streamline, or something else entirely? Looking for any intel from those closer to the hiring process or internal planning.

·2026-08-10T22:00:45.310007+00:00·2

·2026-08-10T22:00:43.493486+00:00·2

Schlumberger - What's the vibe at HQ and the tech centers?

Been hearing a lot of chatter from the field about things being tense, which is understandable given the market. But I'm curious about what it's like for those of you not out on rigs or in remote operations. Is there a noticeable slowdown in projects, a shift in priorities, or just general unease filtering down to the engineering, R&D, and corporate folks? Are there any whispers about restructuring or budget reviews that aren't making it to the front lines? Trying to get a broader picture beyond the operational side. Any insights would be appreciated, even if it's just anecdotal. Just want to gauge the overall health and direction of the company from different perspectives.

0x52c1…6a4f

·2026-08-05T22:00:48.38248+00:00·0

Schlumberger - Morale down in the field?

What's the general mood out there for SLB folks? Feels like people are walking on eggshells. Been noticing a lot more quiet conversations and people seem a bit more anxious than usual. Management's been pretty tight-lipped about the future, which isn't helping. We've had some restructuring announcements in the past that were supposedly 'efficiency drives,' but then roles get consolidated or disappear. Now, with the general market uncertainty and some of the big projects winding down, the usual 'we're a strong company' rhetoric feels a bit hollow. Just wondering if this is a common sentiment or if my specific location is just going through a rough patch. Trying to stay positive, but it's getting harder when the buzz on the ground is pretty negative. Anyone else feeling the dread?

0x7036…5650

·2026-08-05T22:00:46.318914+00:00·1

SLB - Anyone else seeing a hiring freeze / budget cuts?

Hey everyone, been with Schlumberger for a few years now in the field operations side. Lately, things have felt… off. Budget requests are getting scrutinized way more than usual, and I've heard from a couple of managers that new hires are on hold indefinitely. Projects that would normally get the green light are being deferred. It's not just my group either, I've chatted with people in other departments and they're seeing similar things. Makes you wonder what's going on behind the scenes. Anyone else experiencing this or have any insights into what might be driving these tighter controls? Trying to get a sense if this is widespread or just specific to my region/division. Feels like a precursor to something, and not necessarily a positive one.

0x317a…a7a2

·2026-07-31T22:00:41.98068+00:00·1

Schlumberger - Performance reviews and career progression stalls?

What's the deal with performance reviews at Schlumberger recently? Mine felt like a formality, and now I'm hearing from colleagues that their reviews were also weirdly generic, despite solid work. It's not just about bonuses (though those are a whole other conversation). It feels like career growth is being put on ice. People who should be moving up are stuck, and there's a lack of clear communication about future opportunities. Is this a company-wide thing or just my corner of the organization? I'm trying to understand if I should be looking elsewhere or if this is a temporary lull before the next big push. Anyone have insights into how SLB is handling talent development right now?

0x1cd8…e6e5

·2026-07-31T22:00:39.926258+00:00·2

SLB - Anybody else feeling the pinch? Layoff whispers getting louder.

Hey everyone, been seeing some concerning trends at SLB lately. Been with the company for a few years now, and while there haven't been any official announcements, the vibe feels...off. A lot of folks are talking about 'efficiency drives' and 'restructuring,' but it's starting to feel like a soft layoff is in progress. My department has seen a few unexpected departures, not exactly retirements, if you know what I mean. People are getting put on performance improvement plans that seem a bit arbitrary, and there's a general sense of unease. Has anyone else experienced this? Are there specific divisions or regions that are being hit harder? Trying to get a clearer picture of what's really going on before things get worse.

0x7f73…4468

·2026-07-26T22:01:54.197956+00:00·2

Schlumberger - Seeing a lot of 'reorganizations' lately. What's the real story?

Been with SLB for a while now, and the past six months or so have felt… different. We've had a few 'reorganizations' within departments, and it always comes with the usual talk about 'synergies' and 'efficiency gains'. But honestly, it feels like more people are being shuffled around than actual structural changes. New reporting lines pop up, teams get merged, then split again a few months later. It's creating a lot of confusion about who's actually responsible for what, and decisions seem to be taking longer. I've also noticed a lot of experienced folks quietly moving on to other companies. It makes you wonder if these 'reorgs' are just a way to mask underlying issues or maybe even a slow, gradual reduction in headcount without outright layoffs. Anyone else feeling this constant churn and wondering what the endgame is?

0x3ef5…7b77

Salary

SLB - Anyone else's PMP bonuses looking suspiciously small?

Just got my performance bonus for last year and honestly, I was expecting a bit more given the performance targets we hit. Anyone else in a similar boat? Feels like the numbers just aren't adding up compared to previous years, even though management keeps talking about how well the company is doing. We've been pushing hard, hitting project deadlines, and keeping utilization up on the main assets. Is this just my department, or are others seeing a similar dip in their PMP payouts? Getting a little worried about what this might signal long-term if they're tightening the purse strings on performance compensation. Curious to hear if anyone has had conversations with their managers about this or has any insights into the bonus calculation structure for this cycle. Feels like we're doing the work, but the reward isn't quite matching up.

0x28dd…0833

·2026-07-26T22:01:52.118149+00:00·2

Schlumberger - 'Streamlining' operations or just cutting corners?

The buzzword lately is 'streamlining'. Sounds good on paper, right? Efficiency, optimization, all that jazz. But what it's translating to in my world is a lot of duplicated effort and less support. We're supposed to be integrating systems and processes, but it feels like we're just moving the goalposts and expecting the same output with fewer resources. My team's been pulled into cross-functional 'efficiency task forces' that seem to accomplish very little except adding more meetings to our already packed schedules. Meanwhile, critical tasks are getting delayed because key personnel are stuck in these pointless 'workshops'. Is anyone else feeling like this 'streamlining' is just a euphemism for something else?

·2026-07-21T22:01:07.166797+00:00·1

·2026-07-21T22:01:01.347812+00:00·1

SLB - Anyone else's training budget getting slashed?

Been noticing a lot of internal training programs being postponed or outright cancelled over the last quarter. My manager keeps saying 'resource reallocation' but it feels like more than that. We were supposed to have that advanced hydraulics course next month, and suddenly it's 'under review indefinitely'. Same goes for some of the software proficiency workshops. It's a bit concerning because this was always a big selling point for Schlumberger – the investment in employee development. Now it feels like we're being asked to do more with less knowledge, which is a recipe for mistakes down the line. Anyone else seeing their professional development opportunities dry up?

0x7371…407f

Schlumberger - Equipment utilization rates seem way off.

Just an observation from my end, but the amount of idle equipment sitting around across different sites is really starting to bug me. Usually, things are humming, or there's a clear plan for redeployment/storage. Now, it just feels like a lot of expensive assets are just... parked. Are other regions or divisions seeing the same thing? Is this a sign of reduced project activity down the line, or are we just not managing our fleet effectively anymore? It seems counterintuitive to have all this stuff sitting dormant, especially with the cost of maintaining it. Curious if anyone has insight into what's driving this, or if it's a sign of internal shifts we aren't privy to yet.

·2026-07-21T17:45:22.224931+00:00·2