Back to Schlumberger Board
0
Rant

Stagnant utilization rates vs. 'operational excellence'

53
0x532e…653d
·1d ago·1 comments
It’s getting laughable at this point. We’re being hammered with mandatory training modules on 'Operational Excellence' and 'Efficiency Optimization' while half the team in my district is sitting in the staging area with absolutely nothing to do. We’re being told to log our hours strictly, but then get questioned why utilization is down. How are we supposed to keep numbers up when the clients aren't greenlighting projects? I have a feeling the next round of cuts is going to be framed as a performance issue, which is total BS. They are looking for any reason to trim the headcount without admitting that the workflow just isn't there right now. Start backing up your personal files and update your resumes, because the narrative they’re setting up is clearly designed to shift the blame onto us when they decide to trim the fat.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (1)

0
28
0x28dd…0833
·1d ago

The disconnect between corporate buzzwords and reality on the ground is the classic SLB experience. They’ve been pushing these ‘efficiency’ initiatives for years, yet the irony of micromanaging idle hands remains lost on management. It’s a performative shell game meant to look good for the quarterly earnings call while everyone in the field just waits for a call that never comes. Hang tight, because those 'optimization' memos are usually the prelude to a layoff announcement.