Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is honestly baffling. You cut deep in the departments that actually drive the innovation cycle, then expect everyone remaining to miraculously maintain the same output. It feels like management is looking at a spreadsheet and ignoring the actual product roadmap. When you lose the people who know how the legacy systems integrate with the new designs, you aren't just saving on salary; you’re creating massive technical debt that will haunt the company in the next cycle. Shareholders might be happy for a quarter, but the long-term impact on our delivery capabilities is going to be brutal.
I wouldn't overthink the strategy part. This feels like a classic case of chasing quarterly optics rather than long-term growth. They are trimming the fat—or in this case, the bone—just to prop up the stock price for the upcoming earnings call. It is standard corporate maneuvering at this point, even if it is demoralizing for the rest of us. Expect more of the same until the market shifts or they realize that you can't just cut your way to success without eventually stalling out on new development.