Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I feel your pain. It’s the classic corporate squeeze—demand sky-high productivity while simultaneously removing the resources needed to actually get there. The focus on aggressive automation with zero budget for tools is a major red flag that management is checking boxes rather than solving systemic inefficiencies. People are burning out because the math simply doesn't add up anymore. Eventually, the talent will just stop bothering to compensate for the lack of support, and the output quality will inevitably tank. It’s unsustainable, and everyone knows it.
Hang in there. I've been watching this unfold from a different division and it honestly feels like a feature, not a bug, of the post-merger culture. They want the output of a much larger team without the overhead, which is why the hiring freeze on backfills is dragging on for eternity. It’s definitely demoralizing to be expected to work harder while being stripped of the very tools that make your job possible. At some point, you have to stop killing yourself to hit these arbitrary KPIs and just let the results reflect the reality of the situation.