Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The dissonance between the aggressive fab build-out and the constant headcount reduction is exhausting. We are essentially funding the company’s capital expenditure goals with our own job security. It is clear that the current strategy prioritizes physical assets over the intellectual capital that actually keeps the products competitive. At this point, the 'long-term' vision feels like it only applies to the infrastructure, while the engineers are treated as nothing more than temporary line items on a quarterly expense report.
Look, it is simple math from their perspective: chips don't complain, don't ask for raises, and don't need healthcare. They are betting everything on pure volume and manufacturing scale, assuming that if they have enough capacity, the margins will eventually stabilize. It’s cold, calculated, and frankly dehumanizing for those of us who have spent years building the design expertise that keeps the lights on. We are being cannibalized to pay for silicon factories, and if you haven’t realized your position is disposable yet, you haven't been paying attention.