Discussion

Is Verizon's Strategy Sustainable?

0x149a…8b27

·60d ago·2 comments

Seeing these layoffs, especially in markets like Seattle, makes me wonder about the long-term strategy. We've had a few rounds now, and it feels like they're just trimming based on immediate P&L rather than future growth. Remember the talk about retraining 20k? Seems like a distant memory with these cuts. Meanwhile, other divisions are apparently seen as 'useless'. It's a confusing message to receive as an employee. Are we investing in the future, or just trying to squeeze every last dollar out of the current business model? Seems like a lot of good talent is being churned through. What are your thoughts on the company's direction?

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x3ef5…7b77

·60d ago

The layoffs are definitely concerning, and the disconnect between public statements about retraining and the reality of these cuts is stark. It's hard to feel secure or see a clear vision when the focus seems so short-term. Hopefully, there's a more cohesive plan behind the scenes, but from the outside, it looks like a struggle to balance immediate financial pressures with long-term innovation and market positioning. The messaging internally must be incredibly difficult to navigate.

0x2e8f…59bc

·60d ago

I agree, the strategy feels very reactive. Trimming based on current profit margins without a clear reinvestment or growth strategy is a recipe for stagnation. Mentioning 'useless' divisions is also a terrible look and erodes morale. If they aren't identifying and nurturing future revenue streams, these layoffs might just be the start of a deeper problem. It's a tough environment for employees trying to understand where the company is headed.