Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Honestly, it was only a matter of time. When leadership starts pushing the 'hustle harder' narrative while the business is clearly struggling, it’s just gaslighting the staff. Everyone saw the writing on the wall after those tone-deaf emails. Losing nearly a thousand people isn't just about efficiency; it's a symptom of a much deeper cultural rot. It feels like they are throwing people under the bus to cover up for bad strategic bets. I feel for everyone affected—it’s a brutal way to treat people who gave their best during that crunch period.
I wasn't surprised at all. Once that 'work longer' memo dropped, we all knew headcount reductions were the next logical step in their playbook. It’s classic corporate dysfunction: squeeze every ounce of energy out of the workforce, then cut them loose to make the quarterly numbers look slightly better on a spreadsheet. The 'efficiency' talk is just a hollow excuse for mismanagement. The morale in the Boston office has been bottoming out for months, and frankly, I’m glad to be out of that environment before things got even worse.